From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28576 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2004 16:25:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28548 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2004 16:25:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040419162534.28547.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "law at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040202213500.13985.cato@df.lth.se> References: <20040202213500.13985.cato@df.lth.se> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13985] [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01618.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-04-19 16:25 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c In message <20040419052909.23755.qmail@sources.redhat.com>, "ebotcazou at gcc d ot gnu dot org" writes: > >------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-19 > 05:29 ------- >For the sake of completeness: they were both asked. Sorry, I must have missed that email message (Eric certainly sent it back in March). The patch looks reasonable to me -- though I must admit, I'm not very familiar with the code in cfgloopmanip.c. You might ping Zdenek directly for a sanity check -- he wrote much of that code originally and is pretty sharp regarding updates of datastructures derived from the CFG such as the loop tree. jeff -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13985