From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17842 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2004 17:59:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17821 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2004 17:59:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040422175954.17820.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030318040600.10129.bosch@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20030318040600.10129.bosch@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/10129] [3.4 only] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg02043.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-04-22 17:59 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 only] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-22 17:48 ------- >Mark sorry not being clear on this one, the patch is which needed to checked in was at: >. The reason why I asking you >because for the darwin maintainers are not as responsive as you are, as you can see that the patch was >from july of last year but only got applied this month to the mainline. > >The patch which you looked over was superseded by a different patch which was applied already to the >mainline when it was 3.4.0. > > That's a simpler patch, certainly. However, I still think a Darwin maintainer should sign off, since this is not a regression. I am not enough of a Darwin expert to make a good determination. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10129