public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
@ 2004-04-21 21:02 christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-21 21:06 ` [Bug c++/15057] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 more replies)
0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: christian dot groove at gmx dot de @ 2004-04-21 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Hy there
first of all, the new gcc-3.4 is a real improvement.
It is definitivly better the the gcc-3.3.1 is used before,
thanks for your work.
OK, here is the bug: The following throw construct cause
a crash of g++ when compiling this (taken from TOra-Tool):
throw (<conditional>) ? <exprA> : <exprB> ;
A workaround for this is the follwing:
static retType __eval( )
{
if <conditional>
return <exprA>
else
return <exprB>
}
I had to do this in order to make the tool TOra to
compile.
Thanks
--
Summary: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a
segmentation violation
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot groove at gmx dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
@ 2004-04-21 21:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-21 21:32 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-21 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-21 20:51 -------
I think this is invalid as the compile needs to do a copy of the expression but I do not know until I look
into the full preprocessed source as there is non yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-21 21:06 ` [Bug c++/15057] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-21 21:32 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-22 21:15 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-04-21 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-21 21:02 -------
It's also a good question whether we get
throw (c) ? a : b;
right in the sense that it means
throw ((c) ? a : b)
and not
(throw (c)) ? a : b
But just as Andrew said: no preprocessed sources, no definite answer.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-21 21:06 ` [Bug c++/15057] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-21 21:32 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-04-22 21:15 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-22 23:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: christian dot groove at gmx dot de @ 2004-04-22 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot groove at gmx dot de 2004-04-22 20:26 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think this is invalid as the compile needs to do a copy of the expression
> but I do not know until I look
> into the full preprocessed source as there is non yet.
The construct ist correct. It worked also in some
previously version of G++ and other c++ compilers
too !
The only think that has to be make sure is that the
types of the conditional structure is unequivocally.
Anyway my replacement was correct, so the conditional
must be correct too !
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-22 21:15 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
@ 2004-04-22 23:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-23 22:45 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-04-22 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-22 22:06 -------
How can we say if you don't provide us with a testcase?
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-22 23:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-04-23 22:45 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-23 22:48 ` [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: christian dot groove at gmx dot de @ 2004-04-23 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot groove at gmx dot de 2004-04-23 22:16 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> How can we say if you don't provide us with a testcase?
>
> W.
Here we are:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
char * null = (char *) 0 ;
// simple exception class
class errMessage
{
private: char messag[20] ;
private: int kind;
public: errMessage(char* msg, int knd)
{
strncpy(messag,msg,19) ;
kind = knd ;
};
};
// the error causing method
int simpleDepp(char* m1)
{
puts ("having some troubles") ;
if (m1 == (void *) 0)
{
throw errMessage("forget me", 23) ;
}
else
{
throw (null == m1) ?
errMessage("panic", 23) :
errMessage(m1, 23) ;
}
}
int main (int argc, char** argv)
{
try
{
const int egal = simpleDepp(null) ;
}
catch(errMessage er)
{
puts("caught something") ;
}
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-23 22:45 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
@ 2004-04-23 22:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-23 22:48 ` [Bug c++/15057] " christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-23 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-23 22:27 -------
I think I miss understood you when you said it seg faulted, I thought the resulting program was
segfaulting and not GCC.
Confirmed in 3.4.0.
Was not broken in 3.3.3, already fixed in 3.5.0.
Here is the backtrace:
539 if (TYPE_P (exp))
(gdb) bt
#0 wrap_cleanups_r (tp=0x808f30e, walk_subtrees=0x808f30e, data=0x0) at ../../gcc/cp/except.c:
539
#1 0x08303092 in walk_tree (tp=0x808f30e, func=0x80aaa90 <wrap_cleanups_r>, data=0x0,
htab_=0x84b64f0)
at ../../gcc/tree-inline.c:1748
#2 0x08303166 in walk_tree (tp=0xbffeb94c, func=0x80aaa90 <wrap_cleanups_r>, data=0x0,
htab_=0x84b64f0)
at ../../gcc/tree-inline.c:1796
#3 0x08303166 in walk_tree (tp=0xbffeb928, func=0x80aaa90 <wrap_cleanups_r>, data=0x0,
htab_=0x84b64f0)
at ../../gcc/tree-inline.c:1796
#4 0x083035cb in walk_tree_without_duplicates (tp=0x808f30e, func=0x808f30e
<cp_lexer_next_token_is_keyword+30>,
data=0x808f30e) at ../../gcc/tree-inline.c:1955
#5 0x080ab1ac in build_throw (exp=0x4019c648) at ../../gcc/cp/except.c:704
#6 0x0809110e in cp_parser_assignment_expression (parser=0x40128580) at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:
13141
#7 0x08091857 in cp_parser_expression (parser=0x40128580) at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:5289
#8 0x080919da in cp_parser_expression_statement (parser=0x40128580, in_statement_expr_p=false)
at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:5593
#9 0x08095477 in cp_parser_statement (parser=0x40128580, in_statement_expr_p=false) at ../../
gcc/cp/parser.c:5477
#10 0x08095a9b in cp_parser_compound_statement (parser=0x40128580) at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:
5658
#11 0x08099ad9 in cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser=0x40128580) at ../../gcc/cp/
parser.c:6150
#12 0x08095950 in cp_parser_statement (parser=0x40128580, in_statement_expr_p=false) at ../../
gcc/cp/parser.c:5730
#13 0x08095a9b in cp_parser_compound_statement (parser=0x40128580) at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:
5658
#14 0x0809927e in cp_parser_ctor_initializer_opt_and_function_body (parser=0x40128580) at ../../
gcc/cp/parser.c:11339
#15 0x0809950f in cp_parser_function_definition_after_declarator (parser=0x40128580,
inline_p=false)
at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:14206
#16 0x0809991d in cp_parser_init_declarator (parser=0x40128580, decl_specifiers=0x4019f9d8,
prefix_attributes=0x0,
function_definition_allowed_p=true, member_p=false, declares_class_or_enum=0,
function_definition_p=0xbffebb47)
at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:14151
#17 0x08094e02 in cp_parser_simple_declaration (parser=0x40128580,
function_definition_allowed_p=true)
at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:6481
#18 0x08094f68 in cp_parser_block_declaration (parser=0x40128580, statement_p=false) at ../../gcc/
cp/parser.c:6397
#19 0x0809a2df in cp_parser_declaration (parser=0x40128580) at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:6317
#20 0x0809a55f in cp_parser_declaration_seq_opt (parser=0x40128580) at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:6226
#21 0x0809a72b in c_parse_file () at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:2319
#22 0x080ec0e2 in c_common_parse_file (set_yydebug=134804238) at ../../gcc/c-opts.c:1237
#23 0x082cc21d in toplev_main (argc=134804238, argv=0xbffebfae) at ../../gcc/toplev.c:1822
#24 0x080ef8de in main (argc=134804238, argv=0x808f30e) at ../../gcc/main.c:35
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail| |3.4.0
Known to work| |3.5.0 3.3.3
Summary|Compiling of conditional |[3.4 Regression] Compiling
|value throw constructs cause|of conditional value throw
|a segmentation violation |constructs cause a
| |segmentation violation
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-23 22:48 ` [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-23 22:48 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-24 9:10 ` [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] " bangerth at dealii dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: christian dot groove at gmx dot de @ 2004-04-23 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-23 22:48 ` [Bug c++/15057] " christian dot groove at gmx dot de
@ 2004-04-24 9:10 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-06-05 20:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-04-24 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-24 05:38 -------
Interesting: by simple variations of the source code, I seem to be able
to trigger ICEs in about every single function of the compiler. Anyway, here
is something pretty small:
-----------
class S
{
public:
S(){}
};
int foo(char* m1) {
throw (m1 ? S() : S());
}
------------
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.3.4-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
x.cc: In function `int foo(char*)':
x.cc:8: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.5-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-24 9:10 ` [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] " bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-06-05 20:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-07 15:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-05 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-05 20:19 -------
Working on a fix.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-05 20:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-07 15:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-07 15:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-07 16:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-07 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-07 15:52 -------
Subject: Bug 15057
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org 2004-06-07 15:52:23
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog c-common.c
gcc/cp : ChangeLog except.c parser.c pt.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh: throw1.C
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr: sizeof3.C
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template: access14.C enum1.C
Log message:
PR c++/15337
* error.c (c_sizeof_or_alignof_type): Use more detailed error
message.
PR c++/15766
* parser.c (cp_parser_iteration_statement): Fix typo in error
message.
PR c++/14777
* pt.c (tsubst_default_argument): Do not defer access checks
while substituting into the default argument.
PR c++/15554
* pt.c (tsubst_copy): Do not try to substitute for an enumeration
constant in a non-dependent context.
PR c++/15057
* except.c (build_throw): Ensure that temp_expr has been
initialized.
PR c++/15337
* g++.dg/expr/sizeof3.C: New test.
PR c++/14777
* g++.dg/template/access14.C: New test.
PR c++/15554
* g++.dg/template/enum1.C: New test.
PR c++/15057
* g++.dg/eh/throw1.C: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=2.2326.2.470&r2=2.2326.2.471
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.476.4.6&r2=1.476.4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.3892.2.115&r2=1.3892.2.116
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/except.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.164.4.4&r2=1.164.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.157.2.31&r2=1.157.2.32
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.816.2.28&r2=1.816.2.29
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.3389.2.197&r2=1.3389.2.198
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/throw1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/sizeof3.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access14.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/enum1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-07 15:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-07 15:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-07 16:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-07 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-07 15:54 -------
Subject: Bug 15057
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org 2004-06-07 15:54:15
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog c-common.c
gcc/cp : ChangeLog except.c parser.c pt.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh: throw1.C
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr: sizeof3.C
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template: access14.C enum1.C
Log message:
PR c++/15337
* error.c (c_sizeof_or_alignof_type): Use more detailed error
message.
PR c++/15766
* parser.c (cp_parser_iteration_statement): Fix typo in error
message.
PR c++/14777
* pt.c (tsubst_default_argument): Do not defer access checks
while substituting into the default argument.
PR c++/15554
* pt.c (tsubst_copy): Do not try to substitute for an enumeration
constant in a non-dependent context.
PR c++/15057
* except.c (build_throw): Ensure that temp_expr has been
initialized.
PR c++/15337
* g++.dg/expr/sizeof3.C: New test.
PR c++/14777
* g++.dg/template/access14.C: New test.
PR c++/15554
* g++.dg/template/enum1.C: New test.
PR c++/15057
* g++.dg/eh/throw1.C: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.3859&r2=2.3860
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.509&r2=1.510
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4083&r2=1.4084
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/except.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.167&r2=1.168
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.200&r2=1.201
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.859&r2=1.860
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3816&r2=1.3817
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/throw1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/sizeof3.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access14.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/enum1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-07 15:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-07 16:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-07 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-07 16:25 -------
Fixed in GCC 3.4.1.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15057
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-07 16:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-21 21:02 [Bug c++/15057] New: Compiling of conditional value throw constructs cause a segmentation violation christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-21 21:06 ` [Bug c++/15057] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-21 21:32 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-22 21:15 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-22 23:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-23 22:45 ` christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-23 22:48 ` [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-23 22:48 ` [Bug c++/15057] " christian dot groove at gmx dot de
2004-04-24 9:10 ` [Bug c++/15057] [3.4 Regression] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-06-05 20:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-07 15:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-07 15:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-07 16:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).