public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
       [not found] <20000210134559.5.jsm@cygnus.com>
@ 2003-06-20  2:25 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  2004-04-23  4:59 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2003-06-20  2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5


bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|C++ sucks, can't you make it|[1 dot 36 dot 3/1 dot 37/
                   |better?                     |dot  dot  dot /3 dot 2/3 dot
                   |                            |3/3 dot 4 regression] C++
                   |                            |sucks, can't you make it
                   |                            |better?
   Target Milestone|---                         |3 dot 4


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2003-06-20 02:25 -------
Still hasn't been fixed :-( At least C has recently become something like 
exceptions, so the C->C++ regression isn't so bad any more.

I suggest adding templates to C, at which point we can probably
finally forget about this PR.

W.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
       [not found] <20000210134559.5.jsm@cygnus.com>
  2003-06-20  2:25 ` [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better? bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-04-23  4:59 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-23  4:59 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-23 16:46 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-23  4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-23 04:30 -------
As I said, it works for me.  I've been writing C++ for 14 years now, so my brain
is damaged.  It's a fine language, it really, really is.  Damn, dumped core *again*?


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
       [not found] <20000210134559.5.jsm@cygnus.com>
  2003-06-20  2:25 ` [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better? bangerth at dealii dot org
  2004-04-23  4:59 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-23  4:59 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-23 16:46 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-23  4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-23 04:28 -------
This one is cute, but I don't want it at the top of the release notes list for
3.4.0.

Since I'm a C++ programmer, I'm going to change it to RESOLVED/WORKSFORME.
Ideally, C++ haters would be able to have a magic filter marking it as
RESOLVED/WONTFIX instead.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
       [not found] <20000210134559.5.jsm@cygnus.com>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-04-23  4:59 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-23 16:46 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-04-23 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-04-23 15:54 -------
I would also like to state that without C++, we would have far less to 
do in gcc. How would we be supposed to become famous gcc hackers if  
we only had to deal with small, simple, and orthogonal languages? C++ 
is the material that allows heros to enter the scenes (imagine how 
boring fairy tales and Greek mythology were if they didn't have dragons 
and monsters at the time...). 
 
W. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
       [not found] <bug-5-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2009-04-28 18:12 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-01 22:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-01 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-01 22:51 -------
*** Bug 40000 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better?
       [not found] <bug-5-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2009-04-28 18:12 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-05-01 22:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-04-28 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #13 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-04-28 18:12 -------
*** Bug 39949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

bonzini at gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hjl dot tools at gmail dot
                   |                            |com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-01 22:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20000210134559.5.jsm@cygnus.com>
2003-06-20  2:25 ` [Bug c++/5] [1.36.3/1.37/.../3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] C++ sucks, can't you make it better? bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-23  4:59 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-23  4:59 ` jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-23 16:46 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
     [not found] <bug-5-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2009-04-28 18:12 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-05-01 22:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).