From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-93325-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27846 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2004 13:30:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27819 invoked by uid 48); 26 Apr 2004 13:30:14 -0000
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:36:00 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040426133011.15146.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/15146] New: [tree-ssa] sequnce point warnings should be done c gimplifier
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg02422.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The sequence point warnings would be better if they were done in the C gimplifier as 
they wuld be able to be shared between the C front-ends and there would be no need for 
another pass through the trees and would be able to catch more.

-- 
           Summary: [tree-ssa] sequnce point warnings should be done c
                    gimplifier
           Product: gcc
           Version: tree-ssa
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 10143,15145
             nThis:


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15146