* [Bug fortran/15181] [gfortran] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
@ 2004-04-27 22:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-27 3:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-27 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-27 22:19 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-04-27 22:19:44
date| |
Summary|gfc_conv_component_ref: |[gfortran]
|Assertion `c->backend_decl' |gfc_conv_component_ref:
|failed |Assertion `c->backend_decl'
| |failed
Target Milestone|--- |tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] [gfortran] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
2004-04-27 22:44 ` [Bug fortran/15181] [gfortran] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-27 3:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-13 9:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-27 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.5.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] [gfortran] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
2004-04-27 22:44 ` [Bug fortran/15181] [gfortran] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-27 3:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-13 9:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 2:30 ` [Bug fortran/15181] " olchansk at panix dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-13 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-13 09:16 -------
*** Bug 15970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Mart dot Rentmeester at nn-
| |online dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-13 9:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-12 2:30 ` olchansk at panix dot com
2004-09-26 16:16 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: olchansk at panix dot com @ 2004-07-12 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From olchansk at panix dot com 2004-07-12 02:30 -------
This change seems to fix the ICE. In my example, gfc_typenode_for_spec() is
never called for "type(wire_type)", so I call to be hand.
[olchansk@send fortran]$ cvs diff -u trans-expr.c
Index: trans-expr.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 trans-expr.c
--- trans-expr.c 29 Jun 2004 22:01:35 -0000 1.12
+++ trans-expr.c 12 Jul 2004 02:28:13 -0000
@@ -217,7 +217,9 @@
c = ref->u.c.component;
- assert (c->backend_decl);
+ gfc_typenode_for_spec(&c->ts);
+
+ assert(c->backend_decl);
field = c->backend_decl;
assert (TREE_CODE (field) == FIELD_DECL);
K.O.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-12 2:30 ` [Bug fortran/15181] " olchansk at panix dot com
@ 2004-09-26 16:16 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 21:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-26 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-26 16:16 -------
The real fix should be in trans-types.c, but I haven't yet figured it out.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-26 16:16 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-30 21:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-09 22:29 ` olchansk at panix dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-30 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-30 21:57 -------
*** Bug 17760 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dr dot johan at gmail dot
| |com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-30 21:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-09 22:29 ` olchansk at panix dot com
2004-10-15 19:59 ` dr dot johan at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: olchansk at panix dot com @ 2004-10-09 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From olchansk at panix dot com 2004-10-09 22:29 -------
FWIW, "gcc version 4.0.0 20041009 (experimental)" error message changed from
"ICE: Aborted" to "ICE: in blah...". Compilation still fails.
My fix of adding "gfc_typenode_for_spec(&c->ts);" right before the assert() in
trans_expr.c:gfc_conv_component_ref() still works and fixes this bug for me. I
suggest that my fix be commited to cvs to close this bug.
/triumfcs/trshare/olchansk/gcc-tree-ssa/install/bin/gfortran -x f95 -c -o
test_gfc_conv_component_ref.o -O2 -g -Wall -Waliasing -Wline-truncation
-Wsurprising -Wunused-labels -fPIC -ffixed-line-length-132
test_gfc_conv_component_ref.f90
test_gfc_conv_component_ref.f90: In function 'bar':
test_gfc_conv_component_ref.f90:25: internal compiler error: in
gfc_conv_component_ref, at /fortran/trans-expr.c:268
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
make: *** [test_gfc_conv_component_ref.o] Error 1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-09 22:29 ` olchansk at panix dot com
@ 2004-10-15 19:59 ` dr dot johan at gmail dot com
2004-10-15 20:17 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dr dot johan at gmail dot com @ 2004-10-15 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dr dot johan at gmail dot com 2004-10-15 19:59 -------
I second this opinion! I tried the fix suggested below and my code now builds
with gfortran "gcc version 4.0.0 20041015 (experimental)".
/Johan
(In reply to comment #6)
> My fix of adding "gfc_typenode_for_spec(&c->ts);" right before the assert() in
> trans_expr.c:gfc_conv_component_ref() still works and fixes this bug for me. I
> suggest that my fix be commited to cvs to close this bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-15 19:59 ` dr dot johan at gmail dot com
@ 2004-10-15 20:17 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-11 19:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16 9:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-15 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 20:17 -------
I'm wondering how the call to gfc_typenode_for_spec (&c->ts) changes
c->backend_decl, but since this works you can send the patch (after adding
spaces before '(') to fortran@gcc.gnu.org, and the person who originally wrote
this code will have to look at it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-15 20:17 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-11 19:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16 9:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-11 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-11 19:11 -------
*** Bug 18432 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mbkennel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/15181] gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed
2004-04-27 22:41 [Bug fortran/15181] New: gfc_conv_component_ref: Assertion `c->backend_decl' failed olchansk at panix dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-11 19:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-16 9:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-16 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 03:50 -------
Fixed. Most likely for a while now.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread