From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13781 invoked by alias); 2 May 2004 17:01:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13760 invoked by uid 48); 2 May 2004 17:01:15 -0000 Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 17:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040502170115.13759.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020106074600.5291.schwab@suse.de> References: <20020106074600.5291.schwab@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/5291] Bad reference to build directory in libstdc++.la X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-02 17:01 ------- > It might be harmless but rather annoying since linker command lines > get longer and longer :-( It's not harmless on the PA. If other libraries are built when the build directory contains libraries, you can end up with a hardcoded dependence on one or more libraries in the build directory. In the case that I saw, it was to libgcc_s.sl. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5291