From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28427 invoked by alias); 3 May 2004 07:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28317 invoked by uid 48); 3 May 2004 07:54:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 07:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040503075426.28316.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040112101346.13653.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <20040112101346.13653.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13653] [3.3 regression] -O2 -funroll-loop miscompiles POOMA testcase X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-03 07:54 ------- I'm a bit confused reading this audit trail. Is there: - a self-contained testcase for the problem? - a valid reduced testcase for the problem? - a volunteer to tell B. Stroustrup that his f*** language makes it impossible for compiler hackers to sleep? ;-) Thanks in advance. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13653