From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17881 invoked by alias); 3 May 2004 17:23:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17874 invoked by uid 48); 3 May 2004 17:23:33 -0000 Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 17:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040503172333.17873.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040503171911.15268.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040503171911.15268.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/15268] [tree-ssa] return statements are not combined on the tree level X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-03 17:23 ------- Confirmed. The reason why I put memory-hog and compile-time-hog is because the conversion from tree to RTL is costly and also there are more basic blocks in rtl which is removed later on. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-05-03 17:23:33 date| | Target Milestone|--- |tree-ssa http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15268