public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/15292] libgfortran depends on c99 functionality round and roundf
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 12:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040505124538.1942.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040505091406.15292.rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>


------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-05 12:45 -------
Subject: Re:  libgfortran depends on c99 functionality
	round and roundf

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 13:43, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-05 12:43 -------
> I was just trying to make the point that glibc added the functions and was wondering why netbsd has 
> not, that is all.  Maybe we should just document that gfortran requires a C99 math library to be present, 
> I think that is a good idea.

And maybe we should fix gfortran so that it doesn't need c99. 
Personally, I think that's an even better idea :-)

R.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15292


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-05 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-05  9:14 [Bug libfortran/15292] New: " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-05 11:37 ` [Bug fortran/15292] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-05 11:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-05 12:14 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-05 12:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-05 12:45 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-05-05 13:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-05 13:24 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-30 16:22 ` [Bug libfortran/15292] " toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2004-06-12 17:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-12 18:01 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-14 17:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040505124538.1942.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).