From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25102 invoked by alias); 5 May 2004 18:28:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25091 invoked by alias); 5 May 2004 18:28:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 18:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040505182831.25090.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040504045136.15276.mckelvey@maskull.com> References: <20040504045136.15276.mckelvey@maskull.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/15276] Erroneous Comparisons of Negative Characters X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00468.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-05-05 18:28 ------- Subject: Re: Erroneous Comparisons of Negative Characters "pcarlini at suse dot de" writes: | > No, they already compare differently (hint: think of a std::string | > that contains a null character). | | I know well about *that* difference, but I'm not persuaded anyway, since the Your question was whether I found the previous description you made inconsistent; I was replying to that question -- which you chosed to elide when replying. Whether you know that difference does not make the different behaviour more, or less, or just inconsistent. | same inconsistency happens considering basic_string-basic_string, | basic_string-char_array, char_array-char_array: again, the internals of No, it does not. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15276