From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22130 invoked by alias); 5 May 2004 21:59:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22043 invoked by uid 48); 5 May 2004 21:59:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 21:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040505215901.22042.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040210131810.14096.falk@debian.org> References: <20040210131810.14096.falk@debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14096] [tree-ssa] [unit-at-a-time] verify_cgraph_node failed with always_inline X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-05 21:58 ------- The cgraph ICE has been fixed by my patch to mainline (so eventually propagated to tree-ssa). I am not sure about whether we really want to error out on requesting out of line copies of always_inline function, so i am keeping PR open. Doing so seems quite strict to me and I am not sure what kind of diagnostics we want (we might just output error when expand_function is invoked, but we also might want to get more infromative and check this on all cases such scenario can happen - taking pointer of static function, declaring function as global and such) Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14096