public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "MichaelLi8195 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/15339] New: function call error Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 15:03:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040507150259.15339.MichaelLi8195@hotmail.com> (raw) //*******mytest.hpp******* #ifndef MYTEST_H #define MYTEST_H #include <iostream> #include <string> template<typename T> //declaration void fun(T val, const std::string seperator); //error, change to //seperator = " " , then it works well template<typename T> //definition void fun(T val, const std::string seperator = " ") { std::cout<<val<<seperator<<std::endl; } #endif //***********test.cpp********* #include "mytest.hpp" int main() { fun(10); } g++ test.cpp -o test and reads "test.cpp:4:error: no matching function for call to `fun(int)'". I think the function should be resolved from its definition not its declaration the first one it encountered. It means that although no default argument is provided in function declaration, as long as it has one default in the definition, it should also work well. -- Summary: function call error Product: gcc Version: 3.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: MichaelLi8195 at hotmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339
next reply other threads:[~2004-05-07 15:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-05-07 15:03 MichaelLi8195 at hotmail dot com [this message] 2004-05-07 15:30 ` [Bug c++/15339] " bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-05-07 16:36 ` llewelly 2004-05-07 15:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-05-07 16:24 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 2004-05-07 16:24 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-05-07 16:36 ` llewelly at xmission dot com 2004-05-07 16:54 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-05-08 16:29 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-05-08 16:32 ` [Bug c++/15339] [DR217] Adding default arguments to function templates in redeclartions should be forbidden giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-05-09 14:19 ` MichaelLi8195 at hotmail dot com 2004-05-09 15:18 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-07-13 20:13 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-07-13 20:14 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040507150259.15339.MichaelLi8195@hotmail.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).