From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25735 invoked by alias); 7 May 2004 15:30:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25718 invoked by uid 48); 7 May 2004 15:30:51 -0000 Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 15:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040507153051.25717.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040507150259.15339.MichaelLi8195@hotmail.com> References: <20040507150259.15339.MichaelLi8195@hotmail.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/15339] function call error X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00732.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-05-07 15:30 ------- Confirmed, here is a smaller testcase: ----------- template void fun(int); template void fun(int = 0) {} int main() { fun(); } ----------- g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc x.cc: In function `int main()': x.cc:10: error: no matching function for call to `fun()' However, we get this from icc: g/x> icc -Xc -ansi x.cc x.cc(2): warning #845: specifying a default argument when redeclaring an unreferenced function template is nonstandard template void fun(int = 0) {} ^ x.cc(5): error: no instance of function template "fun" matches the argument list { fun(); } ^ compilation aborted for x.cc (code 2) So it seems that this is wrong code. Someone will have to look up the exact text in the standard though. I find it odd that this only applies to templates, not to non-template functions. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339