From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22440 invoked by alias); 7 May 2004 16:54:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22065 invoked by uid 48); 7 May 2004 16:54:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 16:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040507165406.22064.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040507150259.15339.MichaelLi8195@hotmail.com> References: <20040507150259.15339.MichaelLi8195@hotmail.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/15339] function call error X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00742.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-05-07 16:54 ------- I fail to see the relevance of the DR to the present case. It doesn't say anything about default arguments for repeated declarations, does it? W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339