From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13090 invoked by alias); 10 May 2004 20:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13066 invoked by alias); 10 May 2004 20:22:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 19:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040510202246.13065.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jason at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030806091852.11828.benko@sztaki.hu> References: <20030806091852.11828.benko@sztaki.hu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/11828] [3.4/3.5 regression] qualified dependent name looked up too early X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00994.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-05-10 20:22 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] qualified dependent name looked up too early On 10 May 2004 20:16:59 -0000, "bangerth at dealii dot org" wrote: > As does icc7 when given -Xc -ansi. It accepts the testcase in default > mode, though. Jason, when you say you tested it with EDG, did you specify > the flags for maximal standard conformance? I used -A, which I believe is the relevant flag. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11828