public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
@ 2004-04-30 16:28 manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-03 12:37 ` [Bug optimization/15230] " charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 more replies)
0 siblings, 20 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-04-30 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
This is on LAST_UPDATED from HEAD at Fri Apr 30 12:48:41 UTC 2004.
Building everything configured as
--host=i686-suse9-linux-gnu --target=i686-suse9-linux-gnu \
--build=i686-suse9-linux-gnu --srcdir=../gcc-20040430 --prefix=/opt/gnu \
--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-checking \
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-interpreter --enable-shared \
--enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib --with-local-prefix=/opt/gnu \
--with-cpu=i686 --enable-nls --verbose \
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,f77,java,objc
and
BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -g"
GCJFLAGS="-O2 -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -g"
results in the following when gcc-3.5.0 is used:
(cd ada/bldtools; gnatmake -q xnmake ; ./xnmake -b ../nmake.adb )
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow (or erroneous memory access)
gmake[2]: *** [ada/nmake.adb] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040430-i686-suse9-linux-gnu/gcc'
Using gcc-3.4.0 instead does not show this error. It's currently impossible to
build GNAT using a gcc-3.5.0; this is not actually a new issue, but has happened
for quite some time now.
--
Summary: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in
STORAGE_ERROR
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: manfred dot h at gmx dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,manfred dot h at gmx dot
net
GCC build triplet: i686-suse9-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-suse9-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-suse9-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-03 12:37 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-03 12:39 ` [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-03 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-03 12:37 -------
Looks like a codegen issue of some sort.
Probably using less aggressive optimization flags would avoid this problem.
Does the problem still reproduce with current sources btw ?
Arno
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|ada |optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-03 12:37 ` [Bug optimization/15230] " charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-03 12:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-03 13:21 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-03 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Summary|Building xnmake using a |[3.5 Regression] Building
|3.5.0 GNAT results in |xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT
|STORAGE_ERROR |results in STORAGE_ERROR
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-03 12:37 ` [Bug optimization/15230] " charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-03 12:39 ` [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-03 13:21 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-03 14:53 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-05-03 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-03 13:21 -------
I didn't check with today's sources, but I doubt, that anything has changed
since the copy I used last time (LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 30 12:48:41 UTC 2004).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-03 13:21 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-03 14:53 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-03 14:58 ` Graham Stott
2004-05-03 14:58 ` graham dot stott at btinternet dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-05-03 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-03 14:53 -------
Using "less aggressive optimization flags" is not going to help here, as this
problem happens while the stage1 compiler is built, not after; hence, no
BOOT_CFLAGS are used, only the standard flags are in effect here.
I'm currently testing a checkout as of 2004/05/03 16:08:46 +0200; will update
the status accordingly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-03 14:53 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-03 14:58 ` graham dot stott at btinternet dot com
2004-05-03 17:43 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: graham dot stott at btinternet dot com @ 2004-05-03 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From graham dot stott at btinternet dot com 2004-05-03 14:58 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using
a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
manfred dot h at gmx dot net wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-03 14:53 -------
> Using "less aggressive optimization flags" is not going to help here, as this
> problem happens while the stage1 compiler is built, not after; hence, no
> BOOT_CFLAGS are used, only the standard flags are in effect here.
>
> I'm currently testing a checkout as of 2004/05/03 16:08:46 +0200; will update
> the status accordingly.
>
On i686-pc-linux-gnu the problem was present upto 2 May but with todays checkout
the problem appears to have gone away.
Cheers
Graham
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-05-03 14:53 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-03 14:58 ` Graham Stott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Graham Stott @ 2004-05-03 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugzilla; +Cc: gcc-bugs
manfred dot h at gmx dot net wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-03 14:53 -------
> Using "less aggressive optimization flags" is not going to help here, as this
> problem happens while the stage1 compiler is built, not after; hence, no
> BOOT_CFLAGS are used, only the standard flags are in effect here.
>
> I'm currently testing a checkout as of 2004/05/03 16:08:46 +0200; will update
> the status accordingly.
>
On i686-pc-linux-gnu the problem was present upto 2 May but with todays checkout
the problem appears to have gone away.
Cheers
Graham
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-03 14:58 ` graham dot stott at btinternet dot com
@ 2004-05-03 17:43 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-04 7:24 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-05-03 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-03 17:43 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
Hmm, I just finished the build, and installed it; using this compiler for the
bootstrap (using the exact same sources) still results in the original behaviour.
Graham, which flags (configure and runtime, ie. BOOT_CFLAGS, CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS)
did you actually use when you built the compiler which you could successfully
use as a bootstrap compiler?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |graham dot stott at
| |btinternet dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-03 17:43 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-04 7:24 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-04 7:25 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-05-04 7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-04 07:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=6219)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6219&action=view)
Debugging session for xnmake
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-04 7:24 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-04 7:25 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-04 23:10 ` chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-05-04 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-04 07:25 -------
OK, restarting at zero... Built and installed a new tool chain still from the
same sources, but this time using the default flags only, ie.
BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2"
CFLAGS="-O2"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -g"
GCJFLAGS="-O2 -g"
Using this tool chain still crashes the same way as before. Running gdb-6.1 on
the crashed executable doesn't show much other than the call chain (see
attachment "gdb.log"). Here's again the excerpt from the build logs:
mkdir -p ada/bldtools
cp -p ../../gcc-20040503/gcc/ada/sinfo.ads
../../gcc-20040503/gcc/ada/nmake.adt ../../gcc-20040503/gcc/ada/xnmake.adb
ada/bldtools
(cd ada/bldtools; gnatmake -q xnmake ; ./xnmake -b ../nmake.adb )
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow (or erroneous memory access)
gmake[2]: *** [ada/nmake.adb] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040503-i686-suse9-linux-gnu/gcc'
gmake[1]: *** [stage1_build] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040503-i686-suse9-linux-gnu/gcc'
gmake: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
gmake: Leaving directory `/home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040503-i686-suse9-linux-gnu'
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-04 7:25 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-04 23:10 ` chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com
2004-05-04 23:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com @ 2004-05-04 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2004-05-04 23:10 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Looks like a codegen issue of some sort.
> Probably using less aggressive optimization flags would avoid this problem.
>
> Does the problem still reproduce with current sources btw ?
>
> Arno
This problem started occurring with the following patch:
date: 2004/04/17 06:53:41; author: bonzini; state: Exp; lines: +19 -0
2004-04-17 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
* opts.c (decode_options): Do not enable flag_rename_registers
and flag_web at -O3.
* toplev.c (flag_rename_registers): Initialize
flag_rename_registers and flag_web to
AUTODETECT_FLAG_VAR_TRACKING.
(default_debug_hooks): New global.
(process_options): Initialize default_debug_hooks. Warn if
-fvar-tracking specified but not supported by the current
debug format. Do not run var tracking at -O0 or if not
supported by the current debug format, even if
-fvar-tracking was given. If -fno-rename-registers
is not specified, always run register renaming if var
tracking is supported by the default debugging information
format for the target, and we are at -O1 or higher; similarly
for -fweb, but only at -O2 or higher.
* doc/invoke.texi (Optimize Options): Document this.
This patch did not really change the compiler much - it just enabled the
rename-registers and web optimizations at lower optimization levels. The
rename-registers had other problems and was disabled later with this patch:
date: 2004/04/20 09:27:25; author: bonzini; state: Exp; lines: +10 -0
2004-04-19 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
Revert part of 2004-04-17 change that moved -frename-registers
to -O1. -frename-registers is buggy.
* toplev.c (flag_rename_registers): Initialize to 0.
* doc/invoke.texi (Optimize options): Move -frename-registers
to "Not triggered by any -O level" section. Adjust commentary
accordingly.
The boot problem still remains so it is some miscompilation related to -fweb.
I can confirm that if -fweb is disabled, the compiler that is build can also
bootstrap itself.
If gnat-spitbot and gnat-spitbol-patterns are compiled with -fno-web and linked
with xnmake the error trasnforms to a constraint_error. The result of all this
is that I still do not know if the problem is that the compiler generates bad
code or whether the ada runtime library is miscompiled. Anyway more information
for someone that knows what -fweb does.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-04 23:10 ` chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com
@ 2004-05-04 23:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-05 16:55 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-04 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-04 23:14 -------
Honza, you wrote -fweb do you know if this is a bug in -fweb or somewhere else?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-04 23:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-05 16:55 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-12 22:30 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-05-05 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-05 16:55 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Honza, you wrote -fweb do you know if this is a bug in -fweb or somewhere else?
To further confirm what Chris found out, I finished a build and install of
today's checkout plus a small patch, which initializes flag_web to 0 in
gcc/toplev.c, which then in turn could be used _successfully_ to bootstrap the
same sources. FWIW, I'd suggest that we disable -fweb for now, until it's
clarified, why it influences Ada bootstrap badly. Shall I post a patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-05 16:55 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-12 22:30 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-12 22:33 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-05-12 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-12 10:21 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Honza, you wrote -fweb do you know if this is a bug in -fweb or somewhere else?
>
> To further confirm what Chris found out, I finished a build and install of
> today's checkout plus a small patch, which initializes flag_web to 0 in
> gcc/toplev.c, which then in turn could be used _successfully_ to bootstrap the
> same sources. FWIW, I'd suggest that we disable -fweb for now, until it's
> clarified, why it influences Ada bootstrap badly. Shall I post a patch?
Disabling -fweb for all languages actually pessimizes too much. I just tested a
small patch which adds "-fno-web" only to gcc's lang-specs for Ada; the
resulting compiler could bootstrap itself once again without the problems.
I'll attach the patch in a minute and send a message to gcc-patches as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-12 22:30 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-12 22:33 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-13 2:56 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-05-12 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-05-12 10:22 -------
Created an attachment (id=6264)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6264&action=view)
patch to fix the gnat bootstrap problems
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-12 22:33 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-05-13 2:56 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-29 8:02 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-13 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-12 14:33 -------
<<Disabling -fweb for all languages actually pessimizes too much>>
Do we have some data on the impact of this option ?
Could Honza have a look at this PR ?
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-13 2:56 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-29 8:02 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-30 9:46 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-29 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-29 08:01 -------
If this is a -fweb bug, would someone be so kind to try and see
if the following patch cures the problem?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00251.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-29 8:02 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-30 9:46 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-07-17 3:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-06-30 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-06-30 09:30 -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> If this is a -fweb bug, would someone be so kind to try and see
> if the following patch cures the problem?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00251.html
Just tried it on a tree checked out from mainline using "cvs -D 'Fri Apr 30
12:48:41 UTC 2004' co", but it didn't help in this case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-30 9:46 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
@ 2004-07-17 3:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-09 8:58 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-17 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-17 03:58 -------
Well for this to be checked, we have to depend on Ada actually building.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |15416
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-17 3:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-09 8:58 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-07 9:30 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [4.0 Regression] Building xnmake using a 4.0.0 " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-07 9:40 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-09 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 15230 depends on bug 15416, which changed state.
Bug 15416 Summary: Can't bootstrap the gcc-3.5 Ada compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15416
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [4.0 Regression] Building xnmake using a 4.0.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-09 8:58 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-07 9:30 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-07 9:40 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-10-07 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-07 09:30 -------
-fweb is now disabled on mainline because it is not needed after tree-ssa.
Would you please check if this problem is fixed now?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [4.0 Regression] Building xnmake using a 4.0.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-07 9:30 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [4.0 Regression] Building xnmake using a 4.0.0 " giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-10-07 9:40 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
19 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: manfred dot h at gmx dot net @ 2004-10-07 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From manfred dot h at gmx dot net 2004-10-07 09:40 -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> -fweb is now disabled on mainline because it is not needed after tree-ssa.
> Would you please check if this problem is fixed now?
The last time I checked was with a tree checked out on
"Sun Sep 26 13:10:14 UTC 2004". You can find the results at
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-09/msg01171.html>;
so, the problem is apparently fixed now.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15230
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-07 9:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-30 16:28 [Bug ada/15230] New: Building xnmake using a 3.5.0 GNAT results in STORAGE_ERROR manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-03 12:37 ` [Bug optimization/15230] " charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-03 12:39 ` [Bug optimization/15230] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-03 13:21 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-03 14:53 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-03 14:58 ` Graham Stott
2004-05-03 14:58 ` graham dot stott at btinternet dot com
2004-05-03 17:43 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-04 7:24 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-04 7:25 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-04 23:10 ` chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com
2004-05-04 23:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-05 16:55 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-12 22:30 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-12 22:33 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-05-13 2:56 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-29 8:02 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-30 9:46 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
2004-07-17 3:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-09 8:58 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-07 9:30 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/15230] [4.0 Regression] Building xnmake using a 4.0.0 " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-07 9:40 ` manfred dot h at gmx dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).