* [Bug fortran/14959] [gfortran] not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function
2004-04-14 23:25 [Bug fortran/14959] New: [gfortran] (G95) not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function jtk at ou dot edu
@ 2004-04-14 23:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-30 15:00 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-14 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-14 22:22 -------
Note g95 is slightly different than gfortran.
With gfortran I get:
Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'char_util.mod' for reading: No such file or directory
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[gfortran] (G95) not |[gfortran] not recognizing
|recognizing internal file in|internal file in
|PURE/ELEMENATAL function |PURE/ELEMENATAL function
Target Milestone|--- |tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14959
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/14959] [gfortran] not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function
2004-04-14 23:25 [Bug fortran/14959] New: [gfortran] (G95) not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function jtk at ou dot edu
2004-04-14 23:28 ` [Bug fortran/14959] [gfortran] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-30 15:00 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2004-05-13 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de @ 2004-04-30 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2004-04-30 14:06 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Note g95 is slightly different than gfortran.
>
> With gfortran I get:
> Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'char_util.mod' for reading: No such file
or directory
This is because the testcase is not selfcontained.
ELEMENTAL FUNCTION FMT_GN(N)
! Gn IO Format Specifier
INTEGER(4), INTENT(IN) :: N
CHARACTER(LEN=12) :: FMT_GN
! Calling Sequence:
! N Width of Field
! FMT_GN Format character string
!
INTEGER(4) :: N2
CHARACTER(LEN=4) :: C_NUM, C_NUM2
INTEGER :: IOS
!
N2 = N - 7
WRITE(C_NUM ,'(I4)',IOSTAT=IOS) N
WRITE(C_NUM2,'(I4)',IOSTAT=IOS) N2
!
FMT_GN = '(1PG'//C_NUM//'.'//C_NUM2//')'
END FUNCTION FMT_GN
compiles flawlessly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14959
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/14959] [gfortran] not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function
2004-04-14 23:25 [Bug fortran/14959] New: [gfortran] (G95) not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function jtk at ou dot edu
2004-04-14 23:28 ` [Bug fortran/14959] [gfortran] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-30 15:00 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
@ 2004-05-13 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-13 11:50 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-13 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-12 17:46 -------
Can you provide a self contained example?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Keywords| |rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14959
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/14959] [gfortran] not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function
2004-04-14 23:25 [Bug fortran/14959] New: [gfortran] (G95) not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function jtk at ou dot edu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-13 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-13 11:50 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-13 11:52 ` jtk at octopus dot scif dot ou dot edu
2004-07-09 23:02 ` [Bug fortran/14959] " Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-13 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-12 23:01 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you provide a self contained example?
No, because I can't reproduce it. The testcase I gave removes the dependency on
the module, but it doesn't fail. Looking at the original bug submission again,
this seems to be a problem in g95, not gfortran.
J. Timothy, if your problem persists, and if I understand correctly that your
problem is in g95, I suggest you ask Andy Vaught about it (and suggest to him
that he works with the gfortran people again :-). According to their status
page, it's fixed there as well.
Independent of that, we would also appreciate if you tried gfortran on your
code, and tell us if it works.
I'm closing this bug as WORKSFORME. If you believe that you did actually find a
bug in gfortran, you're welcome to open it again. If you do so, please provide
more detailed information.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14959
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/14959] [gfortran] not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function
2004-04-14 23:25 [Bug fortran/14959] New: [gfortran] (G95) not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function jtk at ou dot edu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-13 11:50 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-13 11:52 ` jtk at octopus dot scif dot ou dot edu
2004-07-09 23:02 ` [Bug fortran/14959] " Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jtk at octopus dot scif dot ou dot edu @ 2004-05-13 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jtk at octopus dot scif dot ou dot edu 2004-05-13 00:27 -------
Subject: Re: [gfortran] not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function
Hello,
The newest copy of g95 now makes it past this problem. I now have other
problems that I will need to narrow down before submitting a bug report.
I do apologize for leaving in the dependency. We use quite a few nested
modules, and many F90/95 features. In fact, the sun compilers didn't
even generate anything except a divide by zero error compiling our code.
SGI and the Intel version 8 compilers also don't make it without
internal compiler errors. Intel v7 and Compaq Digital Fortran do make
it. All in all, it looks like the development is going quite nicely.
As a side note, what exactly is the difference between the gfortran and
g95 projects? The home page for G95 points to the gfortran bugzilla
page.
Thanks,
Tim Kwiatkowski
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 11:01:07PM +0000, tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-12 23:01 -------
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Can you provide a self contained example?
> No, because I can't reproduce it. The testcase I gave removes the dependency on
> the module, but it doesn't fail. Looking at the original bug submission again,
> this seems to be a problem in g95, not gfortran.
>
> J. Timothy, if your problem persists, and if I understand correctly that your
> problem is in g95, I suggest you ask Andy Vaught about it (and suggest to him
> that he works with the gfortran people again :-). According to their status
> page, it's fixed there as well.
>
> Independent of that, we would also appreciate if you tried gfortran on your
> code, and tell us if it works.
>
> I'm closing this bug as WORKSFORME. If you believe that you did actually find a
> bug in gfortran, you're welcome to open it again. If you do so, please provide
> more detailed information.
>
> --
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
> Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
> Resolution| |WORKSFORME
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14959
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14959
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/14959] not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function
2004-04-14 23:25 [Bug fortran/14959] New: [gfortran] (G95) not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function jtk at ou dot edu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-13 11:52 ` jtk at octopus dot scif dot ou dot edu
@ 2004-07-09 23:02 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de @ 2004-07-09 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2004-07-09 23:02 -------
Subject: Re: [gfortran] not recognizing internal file
in PURE/ELEMENATAL function
Sorry for replying late, looks like I missed that mail.
jtk at octopus dot scif dot ou dot edu wrote:
> As a side note, what exactly is the difference between the gfortran and
> g95 projects? The home page for G95 points to the gfortran bugzilla
> page.
That page is not updated anymore, Doug Cox who had been doing that page
seems to have realized that it's not fair from g95 to obfuscate their
code and not submit back their fixes, but still use our bug database.
For information on the relationship between g95 and gfortran I point you
to this comp.lang.fortran thread:
http://tinyurl.com/2qbg8
- Tobi
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14959
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread