public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/15169] New: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
@ 2004-04-27 14:27 carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-27 14:33 ` [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-27 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Compile:
class A { };
void f ()
{
A const a = {};
a->foo;
}
And you get the error:
troep.cc: In function `void f()':
troep.cc:6: error: base operand of `->' has non-pointer type ` constA'
This should be
troep.cc:6: error: base operand of `->' has non-pointer type `A const'
--
Summary: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
2004-04-27 14:27 [Bug c++/15169] New: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-27 14:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 16:47 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-27 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-27 14:15 -------
Confirmed and it is caused by one of Gaby's patches to fix the space issue on the error message.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |diagnostic
Known to fail| |3.5.0
Known to work| |3.4.0
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-04-27 14:15:49
date| |
Summary|" const" on the wrong side |[3.5 Regression] " const" on
|of type in error message. |the wrong side of type in
| |error message.
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
2004-04-27 14:27 [Bug c++/15169] New: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-27 14:33 ` [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-04 16:47 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 17:02 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-04 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-04 16:47 -------
More 'const' and space problems.
I assume the following errors are related to the one descibed above.
../../src/IniFile.cc:88: error: no matching function for call to
`IniFile::Section::Section(xml::node::const_iterator&)'
../../src/include/IniFile.h:39: note: candidates are:
IniFile::Section::Section(constIniFile::Section&)
../../src/include/IniFile.h:63: note:
IniFile::Section::Section(constxml::node::const_iterator&, IniFile&)
../../src/include/IniFile.h:59: note:
IniFile::Section::Section(constxml::node::iterator&, IniFile&)
Although there is no space in front of the 'const' here, I expect
this to be solved when the 'const' qualifier is just *always* put
on the righthand side of the type, even if that type is not a pointer
or reference. Thus,
IniFile::Section::Section(xml::node::iterator const&, IniFile&)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
2004-04-27 14:27 [Bug c++/15169] New: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-27 14:33 ` [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 16:47 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-04 17:02 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 17:14 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-04 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-04 17:02 -------
I meant, even if that type is not a pointer. A const on the righthand
side of a reference is rather nonsense :).
I mentioned this because the alternative way to correct this would be
to output 'const TYPE' rather than 'TYPE const' in the case 'TYPE'
is not a pointer. However, I advocate the more consistent form of
'TYPE const' for compiler error and warning messages, which is correct
in all cases (whether or not TYPE is a pointer or not).
Personally I used both styles for many years now and found the 'TYPE const'
one much clearer. For one thing it allows one to 'pattern recognize'
const-references easier, as they always end on 'const&'. For example:
void f(Foo const&);
void f(Foo* const&);
both take a const-reference to something as parameter.
The clarity that I experienced would also benefit compiler error messages.
Only if the reader is USED to the 'const TYPE' style he'd prefer this over
the the alternative - but since the compiler is meant for everyone, the most
consistent and (once you are used to it) most clear method should prevail.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
2004-04-27 14:27 [Bug c++/15169] New: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-04 17:02 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-04 17:14 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-05-13 11:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-27 15:34 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2004-05-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-05-04 17:14 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
"carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| More 'const' and space problems.
| I assume the following errors are related to the one descibed above.
| IniFile::Section::Section(constIniFile::Section&)
This is a duplicate of an existing PR.
Patch is pending (in my local tree) to correct it to print
const IniFile::Section&
The order of appearance of the const is not going to change.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
2004-04-27 14:27 [Bug c++/15169] New: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-04 17:14 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2004-05-13 11:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-27 15:34 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-13 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-12 19:38 -------
The no space problem is PR 14913.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " const" on the wrong side of type in error message.
2004-04-27 14:27 [Bug c++/15169] New: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-13 11:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-27 15:34 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-27 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-27 15:32 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg02247.html
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-27 15:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-27 14:27 [Bug c++/15169] New: " const" on the wrong side of type in error message carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-27 14:33 ` [Bug c++/15169] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 16:47 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 17:02 ` carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-04 17:14 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-05-13 11:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-27 15:34 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).