From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32497 invoked by alias); 12 May 2004 23:01:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32482 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2004 23:01:07 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 11:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040512230107.32481.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040414220813.14959.jtk@ou.edu> References: <20040414220813.14959.jtk@ou.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/14959] [gfortran] not recognizing internal file in PURE/ELEMENATAL function X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg01209.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-12 23:01 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Can you provide a self contained example? No, because I can't reproduce it. The testcase I gave removes the dependency on the module, but it doesn't fail. Looking at the original bug submission again, this seems to be a problem in g95, not gfortran. J. Timothy, if your problem persists, and if I understand correctly that your problem is in g95, I suggest you ask Andy Vaught about it (and suggest to him that he works with the gfortran people again :-). According to their status page, it's fixed there as well. Independent of that, we would also appreciate if you tried gfortran on your code, and tell us if it works. I'm closing this bug as WORKSFORME. If you believe that you did actually find a bug in gfortran, you're welcome to open it again. If you do so, please provide more detailed information. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14959