From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29909 invoked by alias); 14 May 2004 17:13:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29856 invoked by alias); 14 May 2004 17:13:44 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 00:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040514171344.29846.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040430200445.15235.ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> References: <20040430200445.15235.ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/15235] [gfortran] libgfortran doesn't build on Solaris 10/x86 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg01487.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2004-05-14 17:13 ------- Subject: Re: [gfortran] libgfortran doesn't build on Solaris 10/x86 ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de wrote: > > Certainly: off_t is in POSIX.1, and I currently see no reason to invent > anything g95 specific. If there is, the type should be called gfc_offset_t > or something like this to avoid the clashes. > > Yeah, seems like this is the right thing to do. I will prepare a patch to this effect later today. I.e. use off_t in all places. Besides, I'm curious, is offset_t different from off_t on Solaris? - Tobi -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15235