* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-22 19:17 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-22 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-22 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-21 18:48 -------
*** Bug 15571 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-22 19:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15570] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-22 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-22 19:20 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-22 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-21 18:58 -------
Either this RTL problem exposed by the tree-ssa or the tree-ssa is miscompiling either beohm-gc (sp)
or libffi.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-22 19:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15570] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-22 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-22 19:20 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2004-05-22 19:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2004-05-22 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-05-21 19:11 -------
Subject: Re: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Either this RTL problem exposed by the tree-ssa or the tree-ssa is miscompiling either beohm-gc (sp)
> or libffi.
At least the 64-bit libffi test results are identical to the 32-bit
results. Manually running the 64-bit boehm-gc gctest gives me a SEGV.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-22 19:20 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
@ 2004-05-22 19:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-22 21:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-22 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC |[3.5 Regression] Many 64-bit
|libjava execution tests time|Solaris 2/SPARC libjava
|out |execution tests time out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-22 19:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-22 21:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-13 9:42 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] Many " andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-22 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-21 21:38 -------
Yes, I saw it too, but for native 64-bit on Solaris 9. I didn't even let the
testing finish, this was damn too long.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-05-21 21:38:41
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] Many libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-22 21:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-13 9:42 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-14 8:28 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-13 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-13 09:42 -------
An update to boehm-gc 6.3 will help. Tested locally and the failures are in the
expected noise.
The update of boehm-gc is work in progress.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] Many libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-13 9:42 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] Many " andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-14 8:28 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-16 22:22 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-31 5:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-14 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-14 08:28 -------
Boehm-gc import done, minor patch necessary.
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q3/msg00583.html)
Issue seems to be solved with the import and the patchlet.
Please confirm.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] Many libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-14 8:28 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-16 22:22 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-31 5:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-16 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-16 22:22 -------
Patch is in cvs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-08/msg00679.html
Please confirm if 64 bit libjava is ok now. Here it is on solaris9, at least
these timeouts are gone and I get some results.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-08/msg00638.html
Thanks,
Andreas
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/15570] [3.5 Regression] Many libjava execution tests time out
2004-05-22 18:46 [Bug tree-optimization/15570] New: Many 64-bit Solaris 2/SPARC libjava execution tests time out gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-16 22:22 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-31 5:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-31 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31 05:59 -------
So closing as fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread