* [Bug fortran/15548] enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran
2004-05-21 1:05 [Bug fortran/15548] New: enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran green at redhat dot com
@ 2004-05-24 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-25 10:01 ` green at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-24 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-23 16:23 -------
I could not reproduce this with "--prefix=${HOME}/fsf-clean-nocheck_c --disable-checking --enable-
languages=c,c++".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15548] enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran
2004-05-21 1:05 [Bug fortran/15548] New: enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran green at redhat dot com
2004-05-24 1:25 ` [Bug fortran/15548] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-25 10:01 ` green at redhat dot com
2004-05-25 10:14 ` [Bug other/15548] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: green at redhat dot com @ 2004-05-25 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From green at redhat dot com 2004-05-24 14:22 -------
I think this has something to do with how I checked out the code.
I get this problem when just check out gcc-core gcc-java gcc-g++ and
gcc/gcc/fixinc, but not when I add gcc/gcc/fortran.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15548] [3.5 Regression] enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran
2004-05-21 1:05 [Bug fortran/15548] New: enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran green at redhat dot com
2004-05-24 1:25 ` [Bug fortran/15548] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-25 10:01 ` green at redhat dot com
@ 2004-05-25 10:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-09 17:48 ` [Bug other/15548] [3.5 Regression] libgfortran in wrong CVS module, breaks build tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-25 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-24 14:34 -------
Confirmed, this is the way the modules are. The problem is that libgfortran should be included in gcc-
fortran and not in gcc-core. Someone needs to change this.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|fortran |other
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |build
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-05-24 14:34:44
date| |
Summary|enable-languages broken wrt |[3.5 Regression] enable-
|libgfortran |languages broken wrt
| |libgfortran
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15548] [3.5 Regression] libgfortran in wrong CVS module, breaks build
2004-05-21 1:05 [Bug fortran/15548] New: enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran green at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-25 10:14 ` [Bug other/15548] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-09 17:48 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-18 3:52 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-09 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-09 17:48 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Confirmed, this is the way the modules are. The problem is that libgfortran
should be included in gcc-
> fortran and not in gcc-core. Someone needs to change this.
Who can do this? Changed the summary to attract more attention :-)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[3.5 Regression] enable- |[3.5 Regression] libgfortran
|languages broken wrt |in wrong CVS module, breaks
|libgfortran |build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15548] [3.5 Regression] libgfortran in wrong CVS module, breaks build
2004-05-21 1:05 [Bug fortran/15548] New: enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran green at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-09 17:48 ` [Bug other/15548] [3.5 Regression] libgfortran in wrong CVS module, breaks build tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-18 3:52 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-21 3:46 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-18 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-18 03:52 -------
Proposed patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg01301.html
The reason we have a problem here is because of an undocumented feature of cvs.
It uses strncmp (test_dir, ignore_dir, strlen (ignore_dir)), thus putting
!gcc/f in the gcc-core module means that we also lose gcc/fortran even though it
wasn't listed. Maybe they meant to use strlen()+1? Maybe I should report this
as a bug? Anyways, this isn't a serious problem after adding the fortran
support, as we wanted to lose gcc/fortran anyways.
However, I just realized that we are probably also losing gcc/fixinc, and I
forgot to check for that. You probably wouldn't notice if you were on a linux
machine. This could be fixed by explicitly adding this dir after the !gcc/f.
Checking...yes I see it is lost from the gcc-core module. Oh well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15548] [3.5 Regression] libgfortran in wrong CVS module, breaks build
2004-05-21 1:05 [Bug fortran/15548] New: enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran green at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-18 3:52 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-21 3:46 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-11 12:50 ` [Bug other/15548] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-12 1:18 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-21 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-21 03:46 -------
The patch is checked in, and the cvs bug has been reported to bug-cvs.
gcc/fixinc is still broken, I forgot to try fixing that, but I really think that
is a cvs bug, so I will wait for a response to that. I believe this is fixed
now. I didn't try a build, but the list of directories checked out with
gcc-core is correct now.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |wilson at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15548] libgfortran in wrong CVS module, breaks build
2004-05-21 1:05 [Bug fortran/15548] New: enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran green at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-21 3:46 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-11 12:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-12 1:18 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-11 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 12:50 -------
gcc/fixinc does not exist on the mainline any more (as it was moved to the toplevel) so this is not a
mainline problem, only a CVS problem so I am removing the target milestone and the regression
marker in the summary.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.0 Regression] libgfortran|libgfortran in wrong CVS
|in wrong CVS module, breaks |module, breaks build
|build |
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/15548] libgfortran in wrong CVS module, breaks build
2004-05-21 1:05 [Bug fortran/15548] New: enable-languages broken wrt libgfortran green at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-11 12:50 ` [Bug other/15548] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-12 1:18 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-12 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 01:18 -------
My CVS patch was accepted and installed into the master CVS sources. We can
patch the local cvs on gcc.gnu.org if necessary, but I don't see any real need
for that, given that gcc/fixinc is now gone. There are no longer any problems
using modules to check out mainline. Using modules to check out old gcc
versions may fail, but I don't know of anyone doing that, and fixing that is
problematic anyways as CVS doesn't version the modules file.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread