From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28469 invoked by alias); 24 May 2004 13:15:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28440 invoked from network); 24 May 2004 13:15:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cenedra.office) (213.160.108.25) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 May 2004 13:15:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 8765 invoked from network); 24 May 2004 13:15:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bob.mobile) (192.168.0.2) by host62-24-231-113.dsl.vispa.com with SMTP; 24 May 2004 13:15:32 -0000 From: Andrew Walrond To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: "exotic" machine modes Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 07:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 Cc: "Jan Beulich" , , References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405241515.31093.andrew@walrond.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg02756.txt.bz2 List-Id: On Monday 24 May 2004 13:40, Jan Beulich wrote: > >Some general comments. > >- Sending mail to gcc-bugs is really not very useful. gcc-bugs is > >primarily used for bugzilla traffic. Anything that isn't bugzilla > >traffic is likely to be missed. You are better off sending questions > > > >like this to the gcc list. > > Hmm, then http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html is wrong in saying "gcc-bugs > is a relatively high volume list for bug reports and general discussion > about bugs in GCC." > Agreed; I just made the same mistake. And I've been subscribed to gcc for years.