public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug optimization/13965] New: [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level
@ 2004-02-01 21:03 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  2004-02-01 21:14 ` [Bug optimization/13965] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2004-02-01 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

It seems that fold takes into account target branch cost. 


ssa-ccp-5.c is a copy testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-5.c

./cc1 -O2 -fdump-tree-optimized ssa-ccp-5.c

the .optimized dump for the second function in the file is:

test55 (x, y)
{
<bb 0>:
  return;

}

./cc1 -O2 -fdump-tree-optimized ssa-ccp-5.c -mtune=pentiumpro

test55 (x, y)
{
<bb 0>:
  if (x == 5 && y != 0) goto <L0>; else goto <L2>;

<L0>:;
  if (x + 22 != 27) goto <L1>; else goto <L2>;

<L1>:;
  link_error ();

<L2>:;
<L3>:;
  return;

}

Thanks to Andrew Pinski for diagnosing this. 

The effect of adding -mtune=pentiumpro to the testcase from PR8361 is:
without -mtune=pentiumpro  97575 assembly lines 
with -mtune=pentiumpro    103723 assembly lines 

This is probably an issue on the mainline too, but it's harder to show a
testcase there.

-- 
           Summary: [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target
                    information at tree level
           Product: gcc
           Version: tree-ssa
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/13965] [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level
  2004-02-01 21:03 [Bug optimization/13965] New: [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2004-02-01 21:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-05-14  1:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/13965] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-01 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-02-01 21:14 -------
Confirmed.  I know that everyone agreed that this is the right thing to do.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |pessimizes-code
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-02-01 21:14:03
               date|                            |
   Target Milestone|---                         |tree-ssa


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/13965] [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level
  2004-02-01 21:03 [Bug optimization/13965] New: [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  2004-02-01 21:14 ` [Bug optimization/13965] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-14  1:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-05-26 12:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-14  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-13 13:56 -------
Mine, I am working on having the if statements folded at a later in the game.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |15357
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/13965] [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level
  2004-02-01 21:03 [Bug optimization/13965] New: [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
  2004-02-01 21:14 ` [Bug optimization/13965] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-05-14  1:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/13965] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-26 12:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-08-13 22:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-09  3:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-26 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.5.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/13965] [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level
  2004-02-01 21:03 [Bug optimization/13965] New: [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-05-26 12:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-13 22:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-09  3:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-13 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-13 22:01 -------
Subject: Bug 13965

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	bdavis@gcc.gnu.org	2004-08-13 22:01:02

Modified files:
	libgfortran/io : open.c 
	libgfortran    : ChangeLog 
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: pr16935.f90 

Log message:
	2004-08-13  Bud Davis  <bdavis9659@comcast.net>
	
	PR gfortran/13965
	* gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/open_rewind.f90: New test.
	* io/open.c (st_open): use flags instead of the unit structure.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/open.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr16935.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.59&r2=1.60
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4134&r2=1.4135



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/13965] [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level
  2004-02-01 21:03 [Bug optimization/13965] New: [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-08-13 22:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-09  3:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-09  3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-09-09 03:53 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15911 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/13965] [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level
       [not found] <bug-13965-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2013-11-09 20:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-11-09 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965

Bug 13965 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.

Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-09 20:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-01 21:03 [Bug optimization/13965] New: [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2004-02-01 21:14 ` [Bug optimization/13965] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-14  1:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/13965] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-26 12:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-13 22:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-09  3:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-13965-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-11-09 20:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).