From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-96733-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5896 invoked by alias); 25 May 2004 15:00:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5660 invoked by uid 48); 25 May 2004 15:00:17 -0000
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:34:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040525150017.5659.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040524213501.15637.green@redhat.com>
References: <20040524213501.15637.green@redhat.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/15637] [3.5 Regression] gcj regression: error: Invalid operand to unary operator while buliding xalan
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg02905.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-25 15:00 -------
Okay here is a small C testcase:
int foo (double x)
{
        double i = -__builtin_inff ();
        return x != i;
}

This is a dup of bug 15476.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15476 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15637