From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25059 invoked by alias); 26 May 2004 18:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25044 invoked by alias); 26 May 2004 18:43:21 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040526184321.25042.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hp at bitrange dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040505140818.15296.hp@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040505140818.15296.hp@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/15296] [3.4 only] Delayed branch scheduling causing invalid code on cris-* X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg03103.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hp at bitrange dot com 2004-05-26 18:43 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 only] Delayed branch scheduling causing invalid code on cris-* On Wed, 26 May 2004, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > Besides, how do you compare the "known to work" field with the > "target version" field? What about the apparent redundancy? Sorry, should've been "target milestone". brgds, H-P -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15296