From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1692 invoked by alias); 26 May 2004 19:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1661 invoked by uid 48); 26 May 2004 19:40:28 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040526194028.1660.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040321182857.14671.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040321182857.14671.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/14671] [3.3/3.4 regression] caller-save.c:491: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg03113.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-26 19:40 ------- > My understanding has been that, your proposed patch would trigger those > regressions. Apparently, thta would not be the case. Which means, I > would need a summary from someone like you or Richard, but as balanced > as possible :-). Ok, then there was kind of a misunderstanding on both sides. The regressions were filed as PR middle-end/15660 by Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14671