public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/15654] [3.5 Regression] ICE in calculate_live_on_entry with -O2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040526235846.23701.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040525193217.15654.green@redhat.com>


------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-26 23:58 -------
The problem actually is in tailcall optimization, where we remove the call
that defines iCodeTop_8, but not the assigment iCodeTop_9 = iCodeTop_8
that follows it.  I am testing the patch for the problem.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2004-05-25 23:43:23         |2004-05-26 23:58:46
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15654


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-26 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-26 14:09 [Bug middle-end/15654] New: ICE " green at redhat dot com
2004-05-26 14:09 ` [Bug middle-end/15654] " green at redhat dot com
2004-05-26 14:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15654] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-26 14:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-26 14:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15654] [3.5 Regression] ICE in calculate_live_on_entry " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-26 14:15 ` belyshev at lubercy dot com
2004-05-26 14:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-27 17:05 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-05-28 10:18 ` green at redhat dot com
2004-05-28 10:25 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2004-05-28 16:01 ` green at redhat dot com
2004-06-09  0:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-09  0:20 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-11 19:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-11 19:58 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040526235846.23701.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).