From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14177 invoked by alias); 27 May 2004 07:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14140 invoked by alias); 27 May 2004 07:54:08 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 18:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040527075408.14139.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040321182857.14671.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040321182857.14671.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/14671] [3.3/3.4 regression] caller-save.c:491: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg03184.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-05-27 07:54 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] caller-save.c:491: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault On Thu, 27 May 2004, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-05-27 03:38 ------- > Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] caller-save.c:491: int > > > The new regression caused by Dave backporting rth's patch on 04/24 is > > unrelated and was detected by me only because I did a full regression > > run on the POOMA tests with the (appearantly) fixed compiler. > > This assertion has not been proved. I've seen a number of bugs recently > that were totally unrelated to the change that introduced them. Well, it has, in so far as reverting the patch fixes the problem. Of course the patch may just uncover a latent problem - but that still makes rth (or the backporter) responsible of fixing the fallout. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14671