public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/14668] [3.4/3.5 Regression] no warning anymore for reevaluation of declaration
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 12:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040528201612.28387.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040321130905.14668.pluto@pld-linux.org>


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-28 20:16 -------
Subject: Bug 14668

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org	2004-05-28 20:16:03

Modified files:
	gcc/cp         : parser.c 
	gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.benjamin: tem04.C 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup: redecl1.C 

Log message:
	PR c++/14668
	* parser.c (cp_parser_simple_type_specifier): Call
	maybe_note_name_used_in_class.
	
	PR c++/14668
	* g++.dg/lookup/redecl1.C: New test.
	* g++.old-deja/g++.benjamin/tem04.C: Add error marker.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.195&r2=1.196
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/redecl1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.benjamin/tem04.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.7&r2=1.8



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14668


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-28 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040321130905.14668.pluto@pld-linux.org>
2004-05-29 11:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-29 12:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-29 12:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-05-29 13:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-21 13:09 [Bug c++/14668] New: declaration of `A*B::A' changes meaning of `A' from `class A' pluto at ds14 dot agh dot edu dot pl
2004-03-25  4:47 ` [Bug c++/14668] [3.4/3.5 Regression] no warning anymore for reevaluation of declaration bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-05-25  1:27 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040528201612.28387.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).