* [Bug fortran/15750] [gfortran] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
@ 2004-05-31 23:03 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
2004-05-31 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi @ 2004-05-31 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2004-05-31 14:44 -------
Sorry, forgot to add [gfortran] to the summary. Additionally, here's a small
test which fails to compile:
program iolength
implicit none
integer :: A(3) = (/1,2,3/)
integer :: iol
inquire (iolength = iol) A
if (iol /= 3) then
call abort
end if
end program iolength
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE |[gfortran] IOLENGTH form of
|statement not implemented |INQUIRE statement not
| |implemented
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] [gfortran] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
2004-05-31 23:03 ` [Bug fortran/15750] [gfortran] " jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
@ 2004-05-31 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-20 15:24 ` [Bug fortran/15750] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-31 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-31 15:04 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-05-31 15:04:09
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
2004-05-31 23:03 ` [Bug fortran/15750] [gfortran] " jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
2004-05-31 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-20 15:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-20 15:27 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-20 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-20 15:24 -------
Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01608.html>.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-20 15:24 ` [Bug fortran/15750] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-20 15:27 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
2004-06-22 0:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi @ 2004-06-20 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2004-06-20 15:27 -------
Wow, you're pretty quick, Andrew.. :)
Anyways, I additionally wanted to mention that the test program above fails even
though there is no fault in gfortran, as it assumes a file storage unit (see
fortran standard) of one word (32 bit) while gfortran actually uses a one byte
(8 bit) file storage unit, as the standard recommends.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-20 15:27 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
@ 2004-06-22 0:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-16 16:52 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-22 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-22 00:44 -------
Subject: Bug 15750
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: pbrook@gcc.gnu.org 2004-06-22 00:43:55
Modified files:
gcc/fortran : ChangeLog io.c resolve.c trans-io.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
libgfortran : ChangeLog
libgfortran/io : inquire.c io.h transfer.c
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute: iolength_1.f90
iolength_3.f90
Log message:
PR fortran/15750
* io.c (gfc_match_inquire): Bugfix for iolength related stuff.
(gfc_resolve_inquire): Resolve the iolength tag. Return
SUCCESS at end of function if no failure has occured.
* resolve.c (resolve_code): Resolve if iolength is encountered.
* trans-io.c: (ioparm_iolength, iocall_iolength,
iocall_iolength_done): New variables.
(last_dt): Add IOLENGTH.
(gfc_build_io_library_fndecls ): Set iolength related variables.
(gfc_trans_iolength): Implement.
(gfc_trans_dt_end): Treat iolength as a third form of data transfer.
libgfortran/
PR fortran/15750
* inquire.c (st_inquire): Add comment
* io.h (st_parameter): Add iolength.
(st_iolength, st_iolength_done): Declare.
* transfer.c (iolength_transfer, iolength_transfer_init,
st_iolength, st_iolength_done): New functions.
testsuite/
* gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/iolength_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/iolength_3.f90: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.81&r2=1.82
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/io.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3881&r2=1.3882
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/iolength_1.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/iolength_3.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.39&r2=1.40
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/inquire.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/io.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-22 0:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-16 16:52 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
2004-08-29 17:04 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi @ 2004-07-16 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2004-07-16 16:52 -------
It seems that the failing testcase is because of the same bug as PR 15364. I'm
not sure though, so I wont put a "depends on" thingy.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-16 16:52 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
@ 2004-08-29 17:04 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-08 19:35 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-29 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-29 17:04 -------
I added the dependency, as it makes easier to find out which bugs are important,
and if 15364 is fixed, we can still reexamine this bug if this was really the
problem (which I do indeed assume).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |15364
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-29 17:04 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-08 19:35 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2004-09-09 23:08 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl @ 2004-09-08 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2004-09-08 19:35 -------
Isn't this solved by now ? The "small testcase" below compiles, and printing
the iolength obtained, gives 12, a not unreasonable answer.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-08 19:35 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
@ 2004-09-09 23:08 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
2004-09-10 7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi @ 2004-09-09 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2004-09-09 23:08 -------
Uh, what "small testcase" do you mean, Toon?
Anyways, the PR can't be closed yet, since the iolength_2.f90 testcase still
fails. Actually nowadays it won't even compile, error message is:
iolength_2.f90: In function `MAIN__':
iolength_2.f90:20: fatal error: gfc_todo: Not Implemented: IO of arrays in
derived types
compilation terminated.
I think the best course of action is to wait until PR 15364 gets fixed, probably
this will get automagically fixed at the same time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-09 23:08 ` jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
@ 2004-09-10 7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-20 9:39 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-10 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-10 07:31 -------
See Paul's comment #6 for the current failing case.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2004-05-31 15:04:09 |2004-09-10 07:31:53
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-10 7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-20 9:39 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-20 9:40 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-20 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 15750 depends on bug 15364, which changed state.
Bug 15364 Summary: Array fields in derived types not printed correctly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15364
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-20 9:39 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-20 9:40 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-20 11:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-06 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-20 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-20 09:40 -------
Fixed. i.e. the testcase from #6 works now.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-20 9:40 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-20 11:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-06 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-20 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-20 11:09 -------
Subject: Bug 15750
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: tobi@gcc.gnu.org 2004-09-20 11:09:47
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute: iolength_2.f90
Log message:
PR fortran/15750
* gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/iolength_2.f90: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4318&r2=1.4319
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/iolength_2.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/15750] IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented
2004-05-31 22:59 [Bug fortran/15750] New: IOLENGTH form of INQUIRE statement not implemented jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-20 11:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-06 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-06 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread