public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
@ 2004-05-23 23:22 hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-23 23:23 ` [Bug target/15598] " hjl at lucon dot org
` (11 more replies)
0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-05-23 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
-O2 -mtune=itanium causes ICE.
--
Summary: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-05-23 23:23 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-23 23:23 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-05-23 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-05-23 05:09 -------
Created an attachment (id=6363)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6363&action=view)
A testcase
make[1]: Entering directory `/export/home/hjl/bugs/gcc/itanium'
/export/build/gnu/gcc-next/build-ia64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc-next/build-ia64-linux/gcc/ -O2 -mtune=itanium -c -o
bar.o bar.c
bar.c: In function `ia64_handle_irq':
bar.c:20: internal compiler error: in bundling, at config/ia64/ia64.c:6715
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
make[1]: *** [bar.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/hjl/bugs/gcc/itanium'
This patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg01270.html
causes bootstrap failure on many platforms, including Linux/ia64. But gcc
passes this testcase. This patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg01451.html
may fix the bootstrap problem. But gcc fails the testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-23 23:23 ` [Bug target/15598] " hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-05-23 23:23 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-24 1:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-05-23 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jh at suse dot cz
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-23 23:23 ` [Bug target/15598] " hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-23 23:23 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-05-24 1:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-24 1:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-24 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-23 11:33 -------
Are you sure that not caused by a modified 3.4.1? As on line 6715 in ia64.c there is no abort.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-24 1:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-05-24 1:24 ` schwab at suse dot de
2004-05-24 1:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-05-24 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-05-23 13:27 -------
I can reproduce with today's 3.4 branch.
bar.c:20: internal compiler error: in bundling, at config/ia64/ia64.c:6902
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-05-23 13:27:35
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-24 1:24 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2004-05-24 1:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-06-01 6:04 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-05-24 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-05-23 15:12 -------
The difference of the cgraph RTL dump between bad and good ones are
+Final callgraph:
+
+ia64_handle_irq: 27 insns needed inlinable
+ called by:
+ calls: do_IRQ
+do_IRQ:
+ called by: ia64_handle_irq
+ calls:
The bad one is missing "Final callgraph".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-24 1:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-24 1:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-24 1:24 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-05-24 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-05-23 15:17 -------
The bad one died before final call graph could be dumped.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-24 1:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-06-01 6:04 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-02 20:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-01 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-01 06:04 -------
I don't understand this code well enough to easily debug it, and I am leaving
for the gcc summit tomorrow.
However, I did notice that if I delete the volatile from the first asm, then it
works. Also, it works if I use -mvolatile-asm-stop. Since that option adds
extra unnecessary stop bits, it should be an acceptable work around in the short
term.
I also noticed that the same workarounds worked for the testcase in 15653. I
didn't try the testcase in 15655.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-01 6:04 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-02 20:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-06-08 7:34 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2004-06-02 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-06-02 20:24 -------
If I use the patch below, this testcase will pass, but not others.
2004-05-24 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* config/ia64/itanium1.md (1_ialu_addr): Also allow I-unit.
(1b_ialu_addr): Likewise.
--- gcc/config/ia64/itanium1.md.bundle 2003-07-07 06:58:34.000000000 -0700
+++ gcc/config/ia64/itanium1.md 2004-05-25 11:26:10.563164935 -0700
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@
(eq (symbol_ref
"!bundling_p && ia64_produce_address_p (insn)")
(const_int 1)))
- "1_M")
+ "1_A")
(define_insn_reservation "1_icmp" 1
(and (and (eq_attr "cpu" "itanium")
(eq_attr "itanium_class" "icmp"))
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@
(eq (symbol_ref
"bundling_p && ia64_produce_address_p (insn)")
(const_int 1)))
- "1b_M")
+ "1b_A")
(define_insn_reservation "1b_icmp" 1
(and (and (eq_attr "cpu" "itanium")
(eq_attr "itanium_class" "icmp"))
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-02 20:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2004-06-08 7:34 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
2004-06-08 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: wilson at specifixinc dot com @ 2004-06-08 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-06-08 07:33 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> * config/ia64/itanium1.md (1_ialu_addr): Also allow I-unit.
> (1b_ialu_addr): Likewise.
I do not believe this patch is correct. I believe the 1*_ialu_addr
patterns are deliberately using M instead of A.
Use of M instead of A restricts bundling unnecessarily, however, it
allows us to accurately model the latency of the operation, which is
particularly important when we have an ialu instruction that generates a
load/store address.
Use of A would not restrict bundling, but would not let us model
latencies accurately. An insn can only have one latency, but the
latency of an ialu insn varies depending on whether it gets scheduled to
an M slot or an I slot.
Hence there is a trade off here between getting bundling right or
getting latencies right. The code as written gets the latecy right when
an ialu generates a load/store address, presumably to avoid an AGI
stall, and gets the bundling right otherwise.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-08 7:34 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
@ 2004-06-08 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-08 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-08 18:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-08 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-08 15:57 -------
Subject: Bug 15598
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org 2004-06-08 15:56:59
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog
gcc/config/ia64: ia64.c
Log message:
2004-06-08 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR target/15598
* config/ia64/ia64.c (bundling): Add missed TYPE_A.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=2.2326.2.480&r2=2.2326.2.481
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.265.2.7&r2=1.265.2.8
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-08 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-08 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-08 18:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-08 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-08 15:58 -------
Subject: Bug 15598
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org 2004-06-08 15:58:29
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog
gcc/config/ia64: ia64.c
Log message:
2004-06-08 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR target/15598
* config/ia64/ia64.c (bundling): Add missed TYPE_A.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.3873&r2=2.3874
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.287&r2=1.288
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15598] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-08 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-08 18:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-08 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-08 18:00 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15598
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-08 18:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-23 23:22 [Bug target/15598] New: [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-23 23:23 ` [Bug target/15598] " hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-23 23:23 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-24 1:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-24 1:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-05-24 1:24 ` schwab at suse dot de
2004-05-24 1:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-06-01 6:04 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-02 20:24 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2004-06-08 7:34 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
2004-06-08 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-08 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-08 18:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).