public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/15776] New: enum optimization produces wrong code
@ 2004-06-02 13:15 gollin at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de
2004-06-02 13:18 ` [Bug c++/15776] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gollin at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de @ 2004-06-02 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The following program doesn't run properly when compiled with -O
#include <stdio.h>
enum OptionStateEnum
{
SLEEPING,
ACTIVE,
INTENDED,
DESIRED,
EXECUTED,
ABORTED
};
int main()
{
OptionStateEnum l[2] = { EXECUTED, ACTIVE };
OptionStateEnum state;
for ( int i = 0; i < 2; ++i ) {
state = l[i];
printf( "state = %d\n", state );
if ( ( state == DESIRED ) ||
( state == INTENDED ) ||
( state == ACTIVE ) ) {
printf( "break state = %d\n", state );
break;
}
}
return 0;
}
The program was compiled using the following command:
gcc -O -g0 optimize-enum.cpp -o optimize-enum.exe
Resulting in the following output:
state = 4
break state = 4
When compiled with -O0 the output is as expected:
state = 4
state = 1
break state = 1
The problem also vanishes when checking for 4 or only 2 enums in the
if-statement. Or when assigning explicit values to the enums (0, 2, 4, 8, 16,
32, 64).
Cheers,
Michael Gollin
--
Summary: enum optimization produces wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gollin at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15776
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15776] enum optimization produces wrong code
2004-06-02 13:15 [Bug c++/15776] New: enum optimization produces wrong code gollin at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de
@ 2004-06-02 13:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-27 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-27 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-02 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-02 13:18 -------
This is a dup of bug 15069 which is fixed for 3.4.1.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15069 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15776
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15776] enum optimization produces wrong code
2004-06-02 13:15 [Bug c++/15776] New: enum optimization produces wrong code gollin at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de
2004-06-02 13:18 ` [Bug c++/15776] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-27 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-27 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-27 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-27 23:32 -------
Reopen as I marked it as a wrong bug as a dup of.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15776
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15776] enum optimization produces wrong code
2004-06-02 13:15 [Bug c++/15776] New: enum optimization produces wrong code gollin at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de
2004-06-02 13:18 ` [Bug c++/15776] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-27 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-27 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-27 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-27 23:32 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16372 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15776
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-27 23:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-02 13:15 [Bug c++/15776] New: enum optimization produces wrong code gollin at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de
2004-06-02 13:18 ` [Bug c++/15776] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-27 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-27 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).