From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-97999-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32673 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2004 00:31:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32666 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jun 2004 00:31:09 -0000
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:31:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040603003109.32665.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040602204532.15784.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20040602204532.15784.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/15784] fold misses binary optimization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-06-03 00:31 -------
#define abs(x) x>0?x:-x
int f(int x, int y)
{
  return (abs(x)) == 0;
}


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15784