[Bug fortran/14957] [gfortran] testsuite issues

["tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-06-03 19:15 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> incorrect equivalence:
> intrinsic_fraction_exponent.f90
> intrinsic_set_exponent.f90

Indeed, this could be achieved with TRANSFER instead. We don't seem to enforce
all restrictions on EQUIVALENCE, we might want to enforce them but allow a way
out via a language extension.
The problem is:
  INTEGER I
  REAL R
  EQUIVALENCE (R,I) ! not allowed, can only equivalence same basic type


> arguments of different kind to max:
> intrinsic_minmax.f90

This is a language extension. See the code in check.c:check_rest(). This
shouldn't pass with -pedantic.

> syntax error (subroutine missing?):
> stack_varsize.f90

Test passes here. Supposedly it's been fixed in the meantime.

> non-standard intrinsic (dcmplx):
> cmplx.f90

A language extension.

> incorrect length of character variables passed:
> intrinisic_index.f90
> intrinisic_trim.f90

True, this is a quality of implementation issue we should keep track of.

> f95:
> st_function.f90, line 32: Subobject of constant not allowed in statement
> function

Do you have a quote from the standard to back this? I couldn't find one.

> several instances where e.g. an integer is passed to a subroutine expecting a 
> real. In principle that is illegal (but very common, indeed).

Does it warn with -pedantic? It should.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957