From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8193 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2004 22:07:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8165 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jun 2004 22:07:10 -0000 Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 22:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040603220710.8164.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "schnetter at uni-tuebingen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040412204218.14928.schnetter@aei.mpg.de> References: <20040412204218.14928.schnetter@aei.mpg.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/14928] [gfortran] minval intrinsic does not understand mask X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From schnetter at uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-06-03 22:07 ------- To my knowledge, the optional argument "mask" may be passed without using the "mask=" syntax. I have looked into the September 2002 draft of the Fortran 200x standard, which, I believe, is in this respect very similar to the Fortran 95 standard. Apart from explaining things in section 12.4.1, it gives an example in note 13.2, listing the allowable calling syntaxes for CMPLX, which also has two optional arguments. From that it is clear that optional arguments may be given without the "name=" syntax essentially as long as all optional arguments before this one are also present. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14928