From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23791 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2004 22:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23765 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2004 22:40:43 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 22:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040604224043.23764.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040412204218.14928.schnetter@aei.mpg.de> References: <20040412204218.14928.schnetter@aei.mpg.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/14928] [gfortran] minval intrinsic does not understand mask X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00524.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2004-06-04 22:40 ------- Subject: Re: [gfortran] minval intrinsic does not understand mask schnetter at uni-tuebingen dot de wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From schnetter at uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-06-04 08:03 ------- > Section 13.2, "Arguments to intrinsic procedures" of the same draft, specifies > that "the valid forms of reference for procedures with optional arguments are > described in 12.4.1". 12.4.1 in turn describes "normal" (non-intrinsic) > procedure calls, where the "name=" syntax is not compulsory. While I see a way to bend the words to support the position that the "MASK=" keyword is mandatory, I agree with your reading. I've just ported over the changes in g95 to support this and will submit them for review tomorrow. - Tobi -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14928