public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
@ 2004-06-05 16:54 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:54 ` [Bug target/15834] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-05 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
IIRC darwin is the last user of NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C. This PR is just for the progress of the getting rid
of the use.
--
Summary: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: *-darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15834] NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
2004-06-05 16:54 [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-05 16:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-05 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-05 16:54 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-06-05 16:54:35
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15834] NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
2004-06-05 16:54 [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:54 ` [Bug target/15834] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-05 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-05 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-05 16:55 -------
*** Bug 7327 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hoel at germanlloyd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15834] NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
2004-06-05 16:54 [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:54 ` [Bug target/15834] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-05 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-10 18:05 ` zack at codesourcery dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-05 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-05 16:55 -------
*** Bug 11390 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rcbilson at plg dot
| |uwaterloo dot ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15834] NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
2004-06-05 16:54 [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-05 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-10 18:05 ` zack at codesourcery dot com
2004-07-08 5:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: zack at codesourcery dot com @ 2004-06-10 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-06-10 18:05 -------
Subject: Re: New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten
rid of
Note that NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C is an inverted flag - that is, we want
to get rid of it by turning it *on* universally.
zw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15834] NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
2004-06-05 16:54 [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-10 18:05 ` zack at codesourcery dot com
@ 2004-07-08 5:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-02 20:16 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-07 13:18 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-08 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-08 05:22 -------
Note I was wrong NetBSD also does not define NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C but I think it is a mistake.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|16317 |
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15834] NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
2004-06-05 16:54 [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-08 5:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-02 20:16 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-07 13:18 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-02 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-02 20:15 -------
I believe AIX needs this behavior for assert.h, ctype.h and possibly other
headers.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/15834] NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of
2004-06-05 16:54 [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-02 20:16 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-07 13:18 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-07 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07 13:18 -------
Just to mention that arm-elf has the same oversight; missing
NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C. (The only define of it in config/arm, is in
config/arm/linux-elf.h.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-07 13:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-05 16:54 [Bug target/15834] New: NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C should be gotten rid of pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:54 ` [Bug target/15834] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 16:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-10 18:05 ` zack at codesourcery dot com
2004-07-08 5:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-02 20:16 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-07 13:18 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).