From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28040 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2004 16:24:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28033 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jun 2004 16:24:21 -0000 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 16:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040607162421.28032.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040329210934.14777.mdorey@bluearc.com> References: <20040329210934.14777.mdorey@bluearc.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14777] [3.4/3.5 regression] typedef doesn't fully expose base class type X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00775.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-07 16:24 ------- The first example has been fixed in 3.4.1. The second example is an accepts-invalid and may not be a regression. In any case, it's going to be hard to fix -- the language actually required that you *both* resolve the typename at template-declaration time, and remember the spelling of the name so that you can do acccess-checks at template-instantiation time. That's not something for which we currently have data structures. So, I'm removing the target milestone for this PR. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|rejects-valid |accepts-invalid Target Milestone|3.4.1 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14777