* [Bug c++/15865] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name
2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: Invalid variable definition through the constructor name giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-06-08 2:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-29 17:20 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-08 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-08 02:29 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-06-08 02:29:31
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15865] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name
2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: Invalid variable definition through the constructor name giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-06-08 2:29 ` [Bug c++/15865] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-29 17:20 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-17 17:11 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-06-29 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-06-29 17:15 -------
*** Bug 7433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |akim at epita dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15865] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name
2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: Invalid variable definition through the constructor name giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-06-08 2:29 ` [Bug c++/15865] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-29 17:20 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-08-17 17:11 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-27 1:09 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-17 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-17 17:11 -------
This is in fact valid code.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11487 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15865] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name
2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: Invalid variable definition through the constructor name giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-17 17:11 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-27 1:09 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-27 1:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-08-27 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-08-27 01:09 -------
You'll have to explain me why, though, Volker. Can you cite me the right
paragraph in the standard? I don't have one handy right now but I'm pretty sure
I checked before filing this bug (too bad I didn't quote it at the time).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15865] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name
2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: Invalid variable definition through the constructor name giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-27 1:09 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-08-27 1:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-27 1:21 ` [Bug c++/15865] [DR 147] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-27 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-27 01:11 -------
I think you should look at the dup bug which gives the reference to the standard:
[3.4/3 says 'because the name of a class is inserted in its class scope, the
name of the class is also considered a member of the class for the purposes of
name hiding and lookup.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15865] [DR 147] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name
2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: Invalid variable definition through the constructor name giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-27 1:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-27 1:21 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-27 1:23 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-27 1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-08-27 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-08-27 01:21 -------
That is misleading, DR 147 clarifies this. It adds this paragraph to
[class.qual]:
If the nested-name-specifier nominates a class C, and the name
specified after the nested-name-specifier, when looked up in C, is the
injected-class-name of C (clause _class_), the name is instead
considered to name the constructor of class C. Such a constructor
name shall be used only in the declarator-id of a constructor
definition that appears outside of the class definition. [Example:
struct A { A(); };
struct B: public A { B(); };
A::A() { }
B::B() { }
B::A ba; // object of type A
A::A a; // error, A::A is not a type name
--end example]
See also testsuite/g++.dg/tc1/dr147.C (xfailed).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
Summary|Invalid variable definition |[DR 147] Invalid variable
|through the constructor name|definition through the
| |constructor name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15865] [DR 147] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name
2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: Invalid variable definition through the constructor name giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-27 1:21 ` [Bug c++/15865] [DR 147] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-08-27 1:23 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-27 1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-08-27 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-08-27 01:23 -------
Also, notice DR 318 with WP status that says that "struct A::A" is instead
valid to define an object of type A.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/15865] [DR 147] Invalid variable definition through the constructor name
2004-06-08 2:11 [Bug c++/15865] New: Invalid variable definition through the constructor name giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-27 1:23 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-08-27 1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-27 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-27 01:52 -------
But we already have another PR about DR 147, see PR 11764.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11764 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15865
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread