From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7406 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2004 06:21:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7277 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2004 06:21:26 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 06:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040608062126.7274.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "wilson at specifixinc dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040331111136.14798.anilp1@kpitcummins.com> References: <20040331111136.14798.anilp1@kpitcummins.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/14798] [3.4/3.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time?] In case of SH target with -O2 option #pragma interrupt doesn't get resetted. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00872.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-06-08 06:20 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time?] In case of SH target with -O2 option #pragma interrupt doesn't get resetted. aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > The points you bring up are good ones, and they do deserve bug reports. But > this patch does fix the problem originally reported, and it is correct in itself. I was arguing that the patch is wrong because while it fixes one attribute, it breaks another. You are arguing that the patch is right because it fixes one attribute. If you are happy with that, then that is fine with me. It is your port. I just feel an obligation to point out that there are still a number of other problems that haven't been fixed yet, and we risk losing knowledge of these other problems if we close this bug report. But since this isn't my port, this isn't my problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14798