From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-98668-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26813 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2004 18:36:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26684 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jun 2004 18:36:53 -0000
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 18:36:00 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040608183638.15878.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/15878] New: a & b & ~a & ~b not optimized at the tree level
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00960.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

>>From looking at bugs which were fixed for 3.5.0 which were done on the RTL, I noticed this one (From 
PR 5263).

int f(int a,int b) { return a&b~a&~b; }

-- 
           Summary: a & b & ~a & ~b not optimized at the tree level
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization, TREE
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15878