From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28096 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2004 22:00:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28074 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2004 22:00:09 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 22:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040608220009.28073.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jason at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040608204054.15882.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20040608204054.15882.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/15882] Check for return type of overloaded operator new too early X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01005.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-06-08 22:00 ------- Subject: Re: Check for return type of overloaded operator new too early On 8 Jun 2004 21:55:29 -0000, "bangerth at dealii dot org" wrote: > Actually, I have no clue how to do that. If I wrote a text and forwarded > it to you, would you help me in doing this? I believe the usual way is to post to comp.std.c++, though I could also forward a message to the committee reflector. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15882