From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9564 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2004 23:52:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9557 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jun 2004 23:52:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040608235244.9556.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040608233841.15885.snyder@fnal.gov> References: <20040608233841.15885.snyder@fnal.gov> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/15885] [3.5 Regression] spurious or misleading va_start warning X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01019.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-08 23:52 ------- No this is valid code, the problem is that the front-end marks the decl (x) as TREE_ADDRESSABLE, so when the gimplify comes along it loads the decl into another tempary decl which causes this warning but this also causes wrong code too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15885