From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24893 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2004 21:26:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24874 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2004 21:26:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040611212618.24873.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040611160703.15941.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040611160703.15941.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/15941] [3.4/3.5 regression] new fails gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-11 and gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-1 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01485.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-06-11 21:26 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] new fails gcc.dg/compat/s Looking at the failure on the trunk, I see that we have two unaligned accesses in test5 in gcc-dg-compat-struct-by-value-1-01. 0x0000bcb0 : ldw -35(,r3),r21 ... 0x0000bcb0 : ldw -35(,r3),r21 Same in gcc-dg-compat-struct-by-value-11-01. 0x0001f3a4 : ldw -36(,r3),r21 The offsets are in hex. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15941