From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7512 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2004 16:13:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7492 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jun 2004 16:13:30 -0000 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 16:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040612161330.7489.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040611160703.15941.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040611160703.15941.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/15941] [3.4/3.5 regression] new fails gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-11 and gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-1 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01583.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-12 16:13 ------- Reverting Richard's patch to function.c eliminates the regression. The regression also affects hppa-unknown-linux if I disable the kernel unaligned handler. The 32-bit PA ABI has rather special requirements for passing 5-7 byte structs. See the comment in function_arg in pa.c. I believe the fail in test5 is caused by trying to pass a 5 byte struct. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rth at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15941