From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-99890-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3256 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2004 04:49:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3247 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jun 2004 04:49:41 -0000
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 04:49:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040618044941.3246.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20031118001326.13095.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20031118001326.13095.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/13095] GCC accepts invalid using declaration
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg02182.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-06-18 04:49 -------
So is this invalid or valid code? Anyone knows?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13095