From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18758 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2004 09:09:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18750 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jun 2004 09:09:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040621090955.18748.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040621084809.16109.pluto@pld-linux.org> References: <20040621084809.16109.pluto@pld-linux.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/16109] error: architecture mismatch on "fzero". X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg02583.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 09:09 ------- > Where is the bug? /usr/lib64/gcc/sparc64-pld-linux/3.4.1/specs? Yes, most likely. Could you post the contents of the 'asm' specs and its children (on Solaris it's asm -> asm_cpu -> asm_cpu_default)? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Component|other |target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16109