From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22322 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2004 09:16:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22292 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jun 2004 09:16:03 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040621091603.22291.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pluto at pld-linux dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040621084809.16109.pluto@pld-linux.org> References: <20040621084809.16109.pluto@pld-linux.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/16109] error: architecture mismatch on "fzero". X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg02585.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-06-21 09:16 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > Where is the bug? /usr/lib64/gcc/sparc64-pld-linux/3.4.1/specs? > > Yes, most likely. Could you post the contents of the 'asm' specs and its > children (on Solaris it's asm -> asm_cpu -> asm_cpu_default)? > *asm: %{V} %{v:%{!V:-V}} %{!Qn:-Qy} %{n} %{T} %{Ym,*} %{Wa,*:%*} -s %{fpic|fPIC| fpie|fPIE:-K PIC} %{mlittle-endian:-EL} %(asm_cpu) %(asm_arch) %(asm_relax) *asm_cpu: %{mcpu=sparclet:-Asparclet} %{mcpu=tsc701:-Asparclet} %{msparclite:-Asparclite} %{mf930:-Asparclite} %{mf934:-Asparclite} %{mcpu=sparclite:-Asparclite} %{mcpu=sparclite86x:-Asparclite} %{mcpu=f930:-Asparclite} %{mcpu=f934:-Asparclite} %{mv8plus:-Av8plus} %{mcpu=v9:-Av9} %{mcpu=ultrasparc:%{!mv8plus:-Av9a}} %{mcpu=ultrasparc3: %{!mv8plus:-Av9b}} %{!mcpu*:%{!mcypress:%{!msparclite:%{!mf930:%{!mf934: %{!mv8:%{!msupersparc:%(asm_cpu_default)}}}}}}} *asm_cpu_default: -Av9a -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16109